Category:Invalid Requests for Comment

An 'Invalid' Request for Comment was closed by Qualitipedia admins usually for one of the following:
 * It bungled the setup so badly that the overseeing admin felt it could not be fixed,
 * It duplicates a recently closed or existing RfC, or belongs in another place
 * It made a nonsense or inactionable proposal (if it is too silly it may also be deleted)
 * It proposed something determined not possible or not reasonable to the QP admins, beyond just community input

A Request for Comment is intended to get an idea of the community's position on a topic, and it should be a step taken after there is a vague idea already what the community thinks of the idea in general (a blog beforehand, or at least a few people agreeing for initial support). Typically something closed for being invalid can be discussed on a blog where it will not be closed unless it causes issue in the mh:qualitipedia:global rules. Similar can apply for Category:Unsuccessful Requests for Comment, though you shouldn't expect much to change since that closure was clearly supported by a fair sample of the community as well.