Don't you think you're going a bit too far with deleting pages on this wiki and its brother wiki? I mean, sure, those pages you deleted, like the one with Star Fox Adventures, may not be as well-written as you want them to be, but they definitely have a place on this wiki. Plus, they can improved anytime, so there's always room for improvement.
Topic on User talk:Zeephare
Jump to navigation Jump to search
I have something I wanna tell you.
I prefer to take care of the quality control of the pages made, rather than keeping a total mediocrity for so many years. I understand they are candidates for these Wikis, but it's better to making quality over quantity pages. We are currently not tolerant of keeping these weaknesses permanent and wanting to improve by somebody in random day. Better to copy the entire source code and paste to sandbox. "Stub" is no longer existent on both Wikis.
Okay, I understand. I was just pointing out that not everyone, not even some admins, can make super-detailed pointers in pages, especially back when Reception Wikis were on FANDOM, but if the pages here need to have good enough details to stay on this wiki, then we'll make sure that they do.
I understand, but some less experienced people can make a page which is enough passable to stay in the wiki. The example is the Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout page - it has enough "passable" pointers to stay (Passable - I don't mean good and even decent, but is still to be swallowed). The Star Fox Adventures page had mostly extremely short pointers. It also depends on the number of pointers - if most of them are fine and some are very short, they still remain. But if a page has, for example, 23 pointers, where only 4 are detailed and the rest are not, we definitely delete such cases.