You are a jerk, for deleting my pages and then criticize my work by literally cussing, and now you delete our conversation 😡.
Did you deleted my conversation?
How old are you (mentally)? I deleted this topic because I don't want this anymore, and you didn't answered to my question. Do you realize you're talking with an administrator and you literally called me "jerk"? If this happens again, I will personally block you, because you annoy me with your yelling, like a preschooler.
I'm criticizing your work for poorly-detailed pointers and writing style (should I do explain?), I never insulted you. Should I show good examples (I mean the example of a good page) for improving your writing and making detailed pointers? And read rules before doing anything on this Wiki.
I understand deleting the first one but I don't understand you deleting the pages that are not finished yet then you deleted it be because it's wasn't enough, I was busy at the time, so please understand me.
Dude, it's still don't give you the rights to crictize me and my pages, and I was busy at time and I wanted to put games that deserve their spot in the aweseomegames.miraheze wiki, and also im a administrator of many wikipedias, I know you didn't insulted me (but my page that was a test) what you said about page for the first time when you replied "What fuck is this shit", I could literally block you for your wrongdoings.
1) If you were busy, so why have you published your both unfinished pages instead of keeping on sandbox, and finishing it later? Publishing unfinished pages for Reception Wikis is absolutely not allowed.
2) Any proof for being an admin on other Wikis?
3) I reacted like that for the first version of your page because it was literally an empty page, which is unacceptable for Reception Wikis standards.
1) Okay I have admit i shouldve put it in sandbox but you should ask me permission before doing it, and also I had to make page fast before having to do work.
2)I'm admin in fandom wikis.
3)I understand it was a empty page, but I think you overacted it.
1) Rather, you should ask if it's fine enough to release an article.
2) Okay, understood.
3) I am too strict more than once, depending on how much mess the author has committed.
I think that the topic is already solved, and finally you answered.
Guess what i found
I just got more generic pages and nothing detailed, and its pages ... just see these: Lunar silver star story, Yakuza like a dragon, Prinny: Can I Really Be the Hero?, Tales Of Berseria, Condemned: Criminal Origins and Dungeons & Dragons (Dungeons & Dragons not is a videogame)
I only deleted two pages. The rest have potential, they just need to be greatly improved.
Delete the Tak pages
The tak page's have very poor writing.
Can you remove outbreak and chronicles spinoffs?
Since you removed re6; can you remove those 4 games from here too which are the games that ı added to this site along with re6?
I did a search and they dont have a good reception either.
First give me links of all pages.
Are you going to create a page for them in cgw?
I'm not gonna makes these pages because they have more good qualities that bad ones, and I haven't played all of them.
Darkside and Umbrella can stay. I have yet to play Outbreak, but keep them for right now. I'm in the process of finishing Dead Aim.
I can ask you a question
Outdated topic about a page which was recreated.
Do you think Bayonetta 2 is well detailed?
The page is not well-detailed. Already deleted.
Well, looks like I'll have to recreate that page as well, since it obviously has a place on this wiki. 🤷♂️
I have something I wanna tell you.
Don't you think you're going a bit too far with deleting pages on this wiki and its brother wiki? I mean, sure, those pages you deleted, like the one with Star Fox Adventures, may not be as well-written as you want them to be, but they definitely have a place on this wiki. Plus, they can improved anytime, so there's always room for improvement.
I prefer to take care of the quality control of the pages made, rather than keeping a total mediocrity for so many years. I understand they are candidates for these Wikis, but it's better to making quality over quantity pages. We are currently not tolerant of keeping these weaknesses permanent and wanting to improve by somebody in random day. Better to copy the entire source code and paste to sandbox. "Stub" is no longer existent on both Wikis.
Okay, I understand. I was just pointing out that not everyone, not even some admins, can make super-detailed pointers in pages, especially back when Reception Wikis were on FANDOM, but if the pages here need to have good enough details to stay on this wiki, then we'll make sure that they do.
I understand, but some less experienced people can make a page which is enough passable to stay in the wiki. The example is the Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout page - it has enough "passable" pointers to stay (Passable - I don't mean good and even decent, but is still to be swallowed). The Star Fox Adventures page had mostly extremely short pointers. It also depends on the number of pointers - if most of them are fine and some are very short, they still remain. But if a page has, for example, 23 pointers, where only 4 are detailed and the rest are not, we definitely delete such cases.
Actually, a lot of people pretty much compare Hollow Knight to Dark Souls.
Which is nearly everyone.
You mean the difficulty? Of course. But the game genre seems different. Metroidvania =/= Soulslike
That may seem true, but the combat and and dark fantasy are similar. Plus both franchises bosses require you to learn their patterns and nail them down (no pun intended).
Batman Asylum is a metroidvania
Ok buddy. I added Metroidvania Games category.
It may not be a metroidvania in the traditional sense, but has the elements of a 3D metroidvania since you have a large area to explore, get new gadgets as you progress, can backtrack, and has areas that require having the right gadget. It's kind of like the newest Tomb Raider games and God of War 4.
Oh, okay, I get it, now.
I'm sorry for the incomplete page earlier.
I accidently clicked on save. I kind of improved the page to make up for that. I'm sorry.
You mean the page about Fall Guys or Among Us?
I kind of rushed when I made the Among Us page.
That's alright. Although the first version of Fall Guys page was deleted by another administrator, so I had nothing to do with that. Well, the rushing is a bad thing when it comes to the quality. Try to use a sandbox more times.
Can i tell you a question
Yes, they were generic that pain. Deleted all ones.